unrelated | No Comments | August 31st, 2008
An age old question of any city worth its transit network, it seems every major metropolis seeks to define itself a central district. In some cases this is innocuous enough, as many a city centre coincides with downtown or the financial district/CBD, or even wherever Main Street may lie. Cities like Chicago and Paris and Philadelphia have such obvious coincisions, yet there are countless other urban cultures that struggle to settle on a defined centre. It would seem that when a city expands enough, it can lose hope for a central district (like Los Angeles) or develop multiple cultural centres (like New York), or perhaps evolve such that the city’s epicentre has next to nothing to do with its urban following (like Tokyo). Likewise a city’s culture can outgrow its urbanity, leaving the traditional downtown highly developed but completely vacant, as has happened with Houston, Brisbane, and Florence.
In some respects, our cities were never designed to take the abuse we masses dole out. No Londoner in 1805 had any idea that the city would become one of the largest in the world, giving birth to subculture after subculture from punk in its many forms — steam punk, cyber punk, punk rock, among others — to the loudest drag queens on the hardest drugs to old ladies in big red hats drinking tea. While Spaniards have always been braced for late night tapas and sangria, Barcelona’s walkways have not. Our major capitals have fared surprisingly well through the rapid and heavy-handed expansion process the industrial revolution has facilitated, and cities like Rome have flourished under innovative urban planning and a touch of civil technology. It many cases, even the most simple aspects of an urban centre can become inseparable from the marks of its nearly-failed attempts at expansion. Can we imagine Chicago or New York without the L or the F trains? And what would Venice look like without its gondola rides down maze-like canals? These charms, hodgepodges of new and old, developed and undeveloped, are what give each city a face.
Yet how and when these characters come to be is an elusive tell. Planned cities like Canberra and Washington DC feel wrong in many ways, though they are specifically designed to support an urban, culturally rich society. Why? Because a city doesn’t feel sufficiently big without misfits, a touch of grit, and architectural accidents. It wouldn’t feel like home if there wasn’t constantly nagging construction noises and failing public service campaigns. Find me a world city without homeless people and you haven’t really found yourself a world city. Most metropolitan networks can be boiled down to one or two great cultural contributions alongside one or two major issues, issues that are constantly changing and contributions that are constantly evolving.
It’s always been one of those global clichés for the small town hero to make it in the big city. No one runs away from the city to live in a small town, just as no one runs away from the circus to be an accountant. This mythos is like tinder to the urban culture. Wherever the inevitable diversity and masses of people with enough convenience to warrant free time set in to a society, that’s when the interesting stuff starts happening. Essentially, once you’ve got a wrong side of the tracks to cross, out comes art and innovation and new movements, though admittedly the more intriguing aspects of urban culture do come out of the woodwork along with the crazies, though, contrary to popular opinion, not necessarily along with higher crime rates. Of course not all urban culture comes from the rougher edges of the city; quite a good deal of culture seeps out from the bourgeois centres as well. It’s the interplay, the tension between high and low, the mere presence of both that captivates me so.
Perhaps this is a highly privileged perspective. After all, not only am I from a large city myself, but one that sat itself in the middle of the giant culture clash that is America. During my time in Tokyo I noticed that Japanese were cleaner, more efficient, more polite, and had (as larger cities tend to) culture in spades. Yet I also noticed that while Japan’s metropolises like Osaka and Kyoto don’t have to deal with multiculturalism and diversity on a daily basis, Western cities like London and Sydney do. I think it is interesting to note that Tokyo has as much its own flair and style and history as Paris or Hong Kong, the city never feels like it’s about to rip itself apart the way more diverse cities like Los Angeles do. In a way living on the unstable edge of a melting pot that’s about to boil over is what makes these places so great. That they’re threatened every day is what makes living in them worthwhile.
Sometimes our urban nucleuses are being threatened by the outside too. Beijing and Shanghai are experiencing an incredible influx of immigrants form rural China that the cities’ infrastructures simply cannot handle. Sometimes our urban oasises are being formed. Once a year a full fledged city complete with public works is created in Black Rock, Nevada just for the hell of it. I’ve gone from living in a city of 4 million people to 10 million to 13 million to 1 million and over again. And here I am, in the most urban country (percentage wise) in the world, and all I can think about is how much I miss urban culture.
There’s something about being able to become one of the nameless faces in a throng waiting to cross the street, or having the ability to slip in somewhere unnoticed, to get truly lost in a room full of people at a somewhere rather than the empty space of a nowhere. I miss the space distinct urban cultures leave for the emergence of roses from rubble: the real painting from graffiti, the real music from beats and breaks, the real parkour from park fences, the real stories and songs and poems from the conversations in coffee shops and bohemian babbling of late-night commuters, in other words the unavoidable distinction that comes from having to be different to survive. I suppose I am so used to experiencing the different that I’ve forgotten what the same is.











